기본 콘텐츠로 건너뛰기

[Feature Stock] Kakao Share Price Plunges Over 11% Despite Share Split

On the 21st, Kakao's share price plummeted to 34,150 won during trading. That's an 11.76% nosedive from the previous day. Just five trading days earlier, it was at 40,100 won. So we're looking at a near 15% drop in just a week. This morning at 9:54 a.m., it opened down about 6%. Then at 10:04 a.m., trading halted completely. When it resumed 30 minutes later, the decline had widened to double digits. There's only one reason: the company is splitting itself in two through a major governance restructuring.




Meanwhile, the KOSPI actually climbed 1.22% that day. So here we had Kakao dropping over 11% on a day when the broader market was rising. This wasn't a market-wide issue—it's squarely a Kakao company story. The subsidiaries felt the tremor too. KakaoPay dropped the hardest at -7.01% (41,800 won). KakaoBank only fell -0.47% (21,100 won). But here's something worth noting: the KOSDAQ plunged 4.82% that day. KakaoGames, a KOSDAQ listing, fell -3.57% (8,650 won). That's actually less than the broader market. So it's tough to say the entire Kakao group was uniformly shaken.

If it's a proportionate split, shouldn't shareholders come out okay?

What Kakao's board approved that day was a proportionate split—dividing the company into two. There are actually two types of splits. An asset split is when the parent company retains 100% of the new company's shares. Individual shareholders get nothing. Your stake gets locked inside the subsidiary—that's what happened with LG Chem's LG Energy Solution split, and retail investors were furious. A proportionate split, though, is different. Existing shareholders receive new company shares in the same ratio they already hold. Say you owned one share of Kakao. You'd end up with shares in both KakaoX (the surviving entity, provisional name) and KakaoAI (the new entity, provisional name). Your stake doesn't vanish. It's more like your one share becomes two pieces of paper.



So why did the stock price fall double digits?

A proportionate split, by definition, shouldn't strip shareholders of their stake. Yet the market reacted this way. There's a reason. When you dig into the disclosed financial statements (as of June 30, 2026), one glaring asymmetry jumps out.


ClassificationKakaoX (Surviving)KakaoAI (New)
Recent Revenue202 billion won2.6461 trillion won
Capital (Net Assets)5.0611 trillion won2.915 trillion won
Split Ratio0.63514630.3648537

KakaoAI is taking over the KakaoTalk-based platform business. Its revenue is about 13 times bigger than KakaoX. But here's the kicker: the split ratio that determines how many new shares you get is backwards. The much smaller revenue generator, KakaoX (0.635), gets the bigger slice. Here's why: the split ratio isn't based on revenue—it's based on book value of net assets. KakaoX is sitting on a pile of subsidiary stakes like KakaoBank and KakaoPay as assets. So on paper, it has bigger capital. In other words, the smaller revenue producer gets more shares. This asymmetry is what makes it hard to have confidence that "my share of this is going exactly where and in what proportion." That's become a source of real uncertainty.




Let's look at the three-month and three-year moves side by side. You'll see why this plunge stands out. On the three-month chart, the price had been drifting gently downward, then on this day it took a sharp step down. On the three-year chart, it's even clearer. This kind of one-day drop is pretty rare in recent years.



For four weeks, you can't buy or sell this stock

There's something more concrete to worry about. According to the disclosure, trading will be halted for about four weeks, from December 30, 2026 to January 26, 2027. You literally can't buy or sell during that window. After an emergency shareholder meeting on December 17, the split date is January 1, 2027, then registration happens on January 4, with the two stocks relisting or changing their listing status on January 27. What the stock prices of the two companies will be after relisting? No one knows yet. On top of that, the original corporate value enhancement plan filing includes this line: "A conglomerate discount arising from the group's diverse business portfolio structure is inevitable." In other words, the company is admitting it's undervalued. But here's the irony: on the very day they announced the fix for that undervaluation (the split), the stock price fell. Paradoxical, right? That said, the filing doesn't spell out how they'll handle treasury shares or whether they plan to convert to a holding company later, so those remain unclear.

Subsidiaries got shaken too

KakaoX will manage subsidiaries including KakaoBank, KakaoPay, KakaoGames, and KakaoMobility going forward. These affiliated companies all wobbled in tandem. KakaoPay took the biggest hit at -7.01%. KakaoGames followed with -3.57%. KakaoBank, which holds a banking license, only dropped -0.47%. It felt relatively lighter. One piece of news—a governance restructuring—moved the entire slate of Kakao's listed subsidiaries in a single day.



By the way, the company's earnings were actually at record highs

Ironically, just two weeks ago on August 6, the company reported Q2 revenue of 2.0985 trillion won and operating profit of 277 billion won (up 36% year-over-year). That's a record quarterly result. Operating margin also improved to the high 13% range. Platform revenue, including TalkBiz, jumped 17%, driving the show. Earnings are clearly improving. But that was only two weeks ago. Now a governance restructuring announcement has sent the stock reeling. You can't really call it good news or bad news in the simple sense. It reads more like a structural-level event shaking the very foundation.

So, where does this stock stand now?

A proportionate split, in principle, shouldn't strip shareholders of their ownership. Yet the stock dropped double digits. There are three reasons: the split ratio is backwards to revenue scale (that asymmetry), a four-week trading halt, and the company's own admission of a conglomerate discount. All three hit at once. This is the window of maximum uncertainty. We still can't know whether this restructuring will actually unlock value in each company.



The watch point is singular: Will the December 17 emergency shareholder meeting approve this split plan as is? And secondly, will the company flesh out more concrete shareholder return plans—treasury shares, dividends, that sort of thing? We have until early January next year, when trading completely freezes for four weeks. This stock has entered an uncommon phase where structure moves before numbers.

This piece is written for informational purposes to support investment decisions and does not recommend buying or selling any specific stock.

#Kakao #035720 #KakaoStockPrice #FeatureStock #ProportionateSplit #KakaoX #KakaoAI #GovernanceRestructuring #KakaoPay #KakaoBank #KakaoGames #TradingHalt #CorporateValueEnhancementPlan #ConglomeratDiscount #SplitRatio #Q2Earnings #PlatformStock #KOSPI #StockInvestment #DARTFiling

댓글

이 블로그의 인기 게시물

Life is Beautiful

  Life is Beautiful 삶은 아름답고 저는 행복해요 정확하겐 모르지만 가족도 잘 지내고 저도 잘 지내고 친구들도 잘 지내요 좋은 사람들 만나고,  여행 다니고, 공부하고, 졸업하고, 일하고 있고, 모든 게 좋아요! 맞아. 내가 사랑하는 사람들이 건강하고, 잘 먹고, 잘 지내는 것 만으로도 인생은 참 아름다운데 생각 보다 그 외의 것들에 신경쓰느라 가장 소중한 걸 돌보지 못한 건 아닌지 지금도 나는 정말 행복하다. 같은 앤디라 더 친밀감이 느껴졌나 ㅎㅎ 이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로, 이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.

도망쳐서 도착한 곳에 낙원은 없다

  이 포스팅은 쿠팡 파트너스 활동의 일환으로, 이에 따른 일정액의 수수료를 제공받습니다.

부자들에게는 과소비가 없다 - 성공스낵

부자가 되는 것을 방해하는 가장 큰 암초는 수입의 상당 부분을 과소비하는 생활 태도이다. 흔히 과소비에는 세 가지가 있다고 한다. 부유층의 과소비, 중산층의 모방소비, 하류층의 자포자기식 실망소비가 그것이다. 하지만 과소비가 능력이상의 소비를 의미하는 이상, 부유층의 과소비라는 것은 존재하지 않는다. 과소비는 부자들이 하는게 아니다. 부자도 아니면서 졸부들을 따라 하는 사람들이 분수 이상으로 소비하는 것이 과소비이다. 나는 한 번도 부자들이 수입보다 더 많은 지출을 하여 카드빚에 시달린다는 말을 들어본 적이없다. 능력에 따라 소비하는 것은 전혀 문제가 되지 않는다. 때로는 능력에 맞지 않게 소비하였지만 과소비라고 보기 어려운 경우도 있다. 이를테면 여행을 좋아하기 때문에 평소에 먹고 입는 것에서 거의 거지 수준으로 살면서 엄청나게 절약하고 그렇게 모은 돈으로 해외여행을 떠나는 사람을 나는 과소비를 한 사람이라고 비난하지 않는다. 오히려 멋지게 사는 사람이라고 믿는다. 술 담배를 모두 끊고 그 돈으로 자기가 좋아하는 취미에 몰두 하거나 이웃 사랑에 사용하는 사람 역시 삶을 지혜롭게 살줄 아는사람 아니겠는가? 내가 과소비라고 단정하는 것은 일상 생활에서 입고, 걸치고, 마시고, 먹고, 놀고, 타는 데 있어서 갖가지 그럴듯 한 핑계를 대며 이루어지는 중산층의 모방소비와 하류층의 실망소비이다. 능력도 없는데 부자들의 소비를 흉내낸다. 재미있는 사실은 바로 그러한 소비가 부자들을 더욱더 부자로 만들어 준다는 점이다. 왜냐하면 그들이 소비하는 것들의 대다수가 실은 부자들이 만들어 놓은 사업체들에서 나오는 것 들이기 때문이다. 차재호 서울대 사회심리학 교수는 심리학적으로 과소비 성향은 권력욕구에서 나온다 고 하면서, 분수에 맞지 않게 과소비를 하는 것은 자신이 힘을 가졌다는 짜릿한 맛을 즐기기 위함이고 희귀한 물건을 사 모으는 것은 권력욕구의 본질이 남에게 깊은 인상을 남기려는 데 있기 때문 이라고 하였다. 많은 수의 신용카드를 소유...